vrijdag 30 november 2007

Dualisme

Referentie:

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Dualism", First published Tue Aug 19, 2003; substantive revision Wed Oct 10, 2007.

Informatief extract:

"This entry concerns dualism in the philosophy of mind. The term ‘dualism’ has a variety of uses in the history of thought. In general, the idea is that, for some particular domain, there are two fundamental kinds or categories of things or principles. In theology, for example a ‘dualist’ is someone who believes that Good and Evil — or God and the Devil — are independent and more or less equal forces in the world. Dualism contrasts with monism, which is the theory that there is only one fundamental kind, category of thing or principle; and, rather less commonly, with pluralism, which is the view that there are many kinds or categories. In the philosophy of mind, dualism is the theory that the mental and the physical — or mind and body or mind and brain — are, in some sense, radically different kinds of thing. Because common sense tells us that there are physical bodies, and because there is intellectual pressure towards producing a unified view of the world, one could say that materialist monism is the ‘default option’. Discussion about dualism, therefore, tends to start from the assumption of the reality of the physical world, and then to consider arguments for why the mind cannot be treated as simply part of that world.

...

Various of Descartes' disciples, such as Arnold Geulincx and Nicholas Malebranche, concluded that all mind-body interactions required the direct intervention of God. The appropriate states of mind and body were only the occasions for such intervention, not real causes. Now it would be convenient to think that occasionalists held that all causation was natural except for that between mind and body. In fact they generalized their conclusion and treated all causation as directly dependent on God. Why this was so, we cannot discuss here."

Creatieve commentaar:

Dit lijkt me een interessant overzichtsartikel. Het beschrijft de geschiedenis en de ontologie van dualisme, argumenten die pleiten voor dualisme, problemen van het dualisme. Boverdien bevat het een verwijzing naar Arnold Geulincx die nuttig kan zijn voor m'n eindopdracht.

Geen opmerkingen: